From: "Gabriel A. Devenyi" Thanks to LinuxICC (http://linuxicc.sf.net), a comparison of a u32 less than 0 was found, this patch changes the variable to a signed int so that comparison is meaningful. Signed-off-by: Gabriel A. Devenyi Cc: Dave Jones Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/cpufreq-nforce2.c | 3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -puN arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/cpufreq-nforce2.c~cpufreq-nforce2c-fix-u320-test arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/cpufreq-nforce2.c --- 25/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/cpufreq-nforce2.c~cpufreq-nforce2c-fix-u320-test Wed Nov 9 16:06:49 2005 +++ 25-akpm/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/cpufreq-nforce2.c Wed Nov 9 16:07:18 2005 @@ -177,9 +177,10 @@ static unsigned int nforce2_fsb_read(int */ static int nforce2_set_fsb(unsigned int fsb) { - u32 pll, temp = 0; + u32 temp = 0; unsigned int tfsb; int diff; + int pll = 0; if ((fsb > max_fsb) || (fsb < NFORCE2_MIN_FSB)) { printk(KERN_ERR "cpufreq: FSB %d is out of range!\n", fsb); _