From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>

In here, I think the following order is more cache-friendly.

Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
---

 fs/fs-writeback.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -puN fs/fs-writeback.c~move-cond_resched-after-iput-in-sync_sb_inodes fs/fs-writeback.c
--- devel/fs/fs-writeback.c~move-cond_resched-after-iput-in-sync_sb_inodes	2006-03-09 20:03:09.000000000 -0800
+++ devel-akpm/fs/fs-writeback.c	2006-03-09 20:03:09.000000000 -0800
@@ -381,8 +381,8 @@ sync_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, s
 			list_move(&inode->i_list, &sb->s_dirty);
 		}
 		spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
-		cond_resched();
 		iput(inode);
+		cond_resched();
 		spin_lock(&inode_lock);
 		if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0)
 			break;
_