From: Alexey Starikovskiy Due to duplicate state elimiation in the loop earlier, the number of valid_states can be less than perf->state_count, in which case freq_table was ending up with some garbage/uninitialized entries in the table. Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi Cc: Dave Jones Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -puN arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c~cpufreq-fix-bug-in-duplicate-freq-elimination-code-in-acpi-cpufreq arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c --- a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c~cpufreq-fix-bug-in-duplicate-freq-elimination-code-in-acpi-cpufreq +++ a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c @@ -693,7 +693,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct perf->states[i].core_frequency * 1000; valid_states++; } - data->freq_table[perf->state_count].frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; + data->freq_table[valid_states].frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; result = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, data->freq_table); if (result) _