From: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>

For consistency, use ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT instead of printk in
acpi_processor_hotplug_notify() for BUS_CHECK and DEVICE_CHECK events

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 drivers/acpi/processor_core.c |    5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -puN drivers/acpi/processor_core.c~acpi-use-acpi_debug_print-instead-of-printk drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c~acpi-use-acpi_debug_print-instead-of-printk
+++ a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
@@ -890,9 +890,10 @@ acpi_processor_hotplug_notify(acpi_handl
 	switch (event) {
 	case ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK:
 	case ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK:
-		printk("Processor driver received %s event\n",
+		ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
+		"Processor driver received %s event\n",
 		       (event == ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK) ?
-		       "ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK" : "ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK");
+		       "ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK" : "ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK"));
 
 		if (!is_processor_present(handle))
 			break;
_