From akpm@linux-foundation.org Thu Apr 26 00:58:14 2007 From: Matthias Kaehlcke Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:12:09 -0700 Subject: drivers/base/attribute_container.c: use mutex instead of binary semaphore To: greg@kroah.com Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, matthias.kaehlcke@gmail.com Message-ID: <200704260712.l3Q7C9XZ023456@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> From: Matthias Kaehlcke use mutex instead of binary semaphore in drivers/base/attribute_container.c Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/base/attribute_container.c | 26 +++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/base/attribute_container.c +++ b/drivers/base/attribute_container.c @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(attribute_container_cl static struct list_head attribute_container_list; -static DECLARE_MUTEX(attribute_container_mutex); +static DEFINE_MUTEX(attribute_container_mutex); /** * attribute_container_register - register an attribute container @@ -77,9 +77,9 @@ attribute_container_register(struct attr klist_init(&cont->containers,internal_container_klist_get, internal_container_klist_put); - down(&attribute_container_mutex); + mutex_lock(&attribute_container_mutex); list_add_tail(&cont->node, &attribute_container_list); - up(&attribute_container_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&attribute_container_mutex); return 0; } @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ int attribute_container_unregister(struct attribute_container *cont) { int retval = -EBUSY; - down(&attribute_container_mutex); + mutex_lock(&attribute_container_mutex); spin_lock(&cont->containers.k_lock); if (!list_empty(&cont->containers.k_list)) goto out; @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ attribute_container_unregister(struct at list_del(&cont->node); out: spin_unlock(&cont->containers.k_lock); - up(&attribute_container_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&attribute_container_mutex); return retval; } @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ attribute_container_add_device(struct de { struct attribute_container *cont; - down(&attribute_container_mutex); + mutex_lock(&attribute_container_mutex); list_for_each_entry(cont, &attribute_container_list, node) { struct internal_container *ic; @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ attribute_container_add_device(struct de attribute_container_add_class_device(&ic->classdev); klist_add_tail(&ic->node, &cont->containers); } - up(&attribute_container_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&attribute_container_mutex); } /* FIXME: can't break out of this unless klist_iter_exit is also @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ attribute_container_remove_device(struct { struct attribute_container *cont; - down(&attribute_container_mutex); + mutex_lock(&attribute_container_mutex); list_for_each_entry(cont, &attribute_container_list, node) { struct internal_container *ic; struct klist_iter iter; @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ attribute_container_remove_device(struct } } } - up(&attribute_container_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&attribute_container_mutex); } /** @@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ attribute_container_device_trigger(struc { struct attribute_container *cont; - down(&attribute_container_mutex); + mutex_lock(&attribute_container_mutex); list_for_each_entry(cont, &attribute_container_list, node) { struct internal_container *ic; struct klist_iter iter; @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ attribute_container_device_trigger(struc fn(cont, dev, &ic->classdev); } } - up(&attribute_container_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&attribute_container_mutex); } /** @@ -295,12 +295,12 @@ attribute_container_trigger(struct devic { struct attribute_container *cont; - down(&attribute_container_mutex); + mutex_lock(&attribute_container_mutex); list_for_each_entry(cont, &attribute_container_list, node) { if (cont->match(cont, dev)) fn(cont, dev); } - up(&attribute_container_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&attribute_container_mutex); } /**