From nobody Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Fasheh Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 13:23:08 -0700 Subject: ocfs2: Remove overzealous BUG_ON() The truncate code was never supposed to BUG() on an allocator it doesn't know about, but rather to ignore it. Right now, this does nothing, but when we change our allocation paths to use all suballocator files, this will allow current versions of the fs module to work fine. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh --- fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) 7e916252e9653d7a9c9a1a9d2125047ea37c0bc2 diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c index edaab05..f43bc5f 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c @@ -1717,17 +1717,29 @@ static int ocfs2_do_truncate(struct ocfs ocfs2_remove_from_cache(inode, eb_bh); - BUG_ON(eb->h_suballoc_slot); BUG_ON(el->l_recs[0].e_clusters); BUG_ON(el->l_recs[0].e_cpos); BUG_ON(el->l_recs[0].e_blkno); - status = ocfs2_free_extent_block(handle, - tc->tc_ext_alloc_inode, - tc->tc_ext_alloc_bh, - eb); - if (status < 0) { - mlog_errno(status); - goto bail; + if (eb->h_suballoc_slot == 0) { + /* + * This code only understands how to + * lock the suballocator in slot 0, + * which is fine because allocation is + * only ever done out of that + * suballocator too. A future version + * might change that however, so avoid + * a free if we don't know how to + * handle it. This way an fs incompat + * bit will not be necessary. + */ + status = ocfs2_free_extent_block(handle, + tc->tc_ext_alloc_inode, + tc->tc_ext_alloc_bh, + eb); + if (status < 0) { + mlog_errno(status); + goto bail; + } } } brelse(eb_bh); -- 1.3.3