From 905ee5185a84a71b20d221e1bb755e561eccd84c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Fasheh Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 11:37:48 -0700 Subject: ocfs2: fix write() performance regression On file systems which don't support sparse files, Ocfs2_map_page_blocks() was reading blocks on appending writes. This caused write performance to suffer dramatically. Fix this by detecting an appending write on a nonsparse fs and skipping the read. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh --- fs/ocfs2/aops.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c index f37f25c..0b5e35f 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c @@ -661,6 +661,27 @@ static void ocfs2_clear_page_regions(struct page *page, } /* + * Nonsparse file systems fully allocate before we get to the write + * code. This prevents ocfs2_write() from tagging the write as an + * allocating one, which means ocfs2_map_page_blocks() might try to + * read-in the blocks at the tail of our file. Avoid reading them by + * testing i_size against each block offset. + */ +static int ocfs2_should_read_blk(struct inode *inode, struct page *page, + unsigned int block_start) +{ + u64 offset = page_offset(page) + block_start; + + if (ocfs2_sparse_alloc(OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb))) + return 1; + + if (i_size_read(inode) > offset) + return 1; + + return 0; +} + +/* * Some of this taken from block_prepare_write(). We already have our * mapping by now though, and the entire write will be allocating or * it won't, so not much need to use BH_New. @@ -713,6 +734,7 @@ int ocfs2_map_page_blocks(struct page *page, u64 *p_blkno, set_buffer_uptodate(bh); } else if (!buffer_uptodate(bh) && !buffer_delay(bh) && !buffer_new(bh) && + ocfs2_should_read_blk(inode, page, block_start) && (block_start < from || block_end > to)) { ll_rw_block(READ, 1, &bh); *wait_bh++=bh; -- 1.5.0.6